December 2009
10 posts
“Die Welt hat eine feste Struktur.”
– Ludwig Wittgenstein
Ancient Goods
Dr. Brad Inwood
University of Toronto
“Go on, then, if you want, make your classifications and lay out your fancy distinctions of goods into three or four or many kinds! These categorizations have no bearing on the issue and this isn’t the way to bring us over to Plato.” This complaint from the Platonist Atticus reflects a long history of debate about the good. Is there just one kind of good or are the complex classifications we find in later ancient texts closer to the truth? One naturally thinks of Plato’s Form of the good or the Stoic idea that only virtue is good, but also of the Stoic claim from the second century BC that it was Plato’s position that only the *kalon* (which to a Stoic meant virtue) is good. At the same point in the second century BC, the Peripatetic Critolaus seems to have galvanized debate about the way virtue and other goods (of soul, body, and external circumstances) relate to happiness and so sparked the intense debate on this topic which seems to have dominated the first century BC, as we see from Cicero’s *De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum*, among other sources.
In this paper I try to reconstruct the history of the doctrine that there are goods of the body, goods of the soul (virtue, of course), and external goods, along the way pointing to the moral of the story; that such technical classifications can sharpen debate about the good life, but can just as easily undermine it if taken too far and provoke a philosophical ‘backlash’. Platonists, Peripatetics and Stoics were all involved, but the positions taken do not align with school affiliations; the philosophical inclinations of individuals seem to play a greater role. Whether this historical exploration has any relevance to those concerned with value theory today is a question I leave to the audience to decide.
When: 1:00 PM, Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Where: Clearihue B315
Who: Everyone Welcome!
“If the basic principles of existing communities really embodied a decent...”
– Allen Wood
“I refuse to accept despair as the final response to the ambiguities of history....”
– Martin Luther King
Dr. Macleod explains the Difference Principle.
BIV Trolley Problem
Consider the following case:
On Twin Earth, a brain in a vat is at the wheel of a runaway trolley. There are only two options that the brain can take: the right side of the fork in the track or the left side of the fork. There is no way in sight of derailing or stopping the trolley and the brain is aware of this, for the brain knows trolleys. The brain is causally hooked up to the trolley such...
“By the law of the excluded middle, either `A is B’ or `A is not B’...”
– Bertrand Russell
“What shall we call a thing anyhow? It seems quite arbitrary, for we carve out...”
– William James
“Philosophy is the strangest of subjects: it aims at rigour and yet is unable to...”
– Kit Fine